Explain this to me as…
This tool checks whether a carried claim remains structurally resonant with the original after being summarized, quoted, clipped, reposted, cited, or argued against.
Original claim → two transfer paths
Original Claim
Carried / Public Version
v0.0.2 does not automatically analyze the text. The text fields preserve scenario context for the export report while the sliders model the resonance and mutation-pressure conditions.
Simulator
v0.0.3 route-proof note: thresholds remain strict. Severe low-resonance cases route to QUARANTINE_CLAIM rather than softer meaning-drift language.
Claim preservation
Mutation pressure
HIR capsule attachments
Route gates
exposed transfer / resonance loss
Drift Flags
HIR capsule / resonance preservation
Capsule Flags
Exportable pressure report
How the model works
The Drift Path shows the claim traveling exposed: base resonance support is eroded by mutation pressure.
The Protected Carry Path shows the same claim traveling inside an HIR capsule. The capsule does not replace the original claim and does not make the claim true — it provides resonance lift. The factor (1 + C_HIR) adds protective lift so the carried version better survives compression, speed, paraphrase, incentive, and status pressure while preserving source, context, uncertainty, scope, consent, and repair path.
A good paraphrase changes the route while preserving the claim. A mutation changes the claim while pretending it only changed the route.
Where:
A_source = Source Match
B_meaning = 0.30×Meaning Match + 0.20×Context Preserved + 0.20×Uncertainty Preserved + 0.15×Scope Preserved + 0.15×Source Match
C_HIR = 0.20×Source Attached + 0.18×Context Attached + 0.18×Uncertainty Attached + 0.16×Scope Attached + 0.14×Consent Attached + 0.14×Repair Path Attached
P_mutation = average mutation pressure